I have been asked if my proofs will have my watermark or logo on them. No, your prints will not have my watermark on them. They will say ©Fishy Face Photography imprinted on the back though. Your digital files will not have the logo on them either.
So why do I put my logo on all of the images online?
There are a couple of reasons.
1) All of my image are copyrighted.
2) Credit is due. Sadly, not everybody links back to me.
3) It prevents cropping and messing up my images.
I frame the images how I like them, I often give more than one version of the same image to my clients, but I like them the way they are. I know people can edit out the logo, but I put it where it would be a huge pain to do so, even if that means that my logo isn't easily readable.
4) The logo prevents clients and others from steeling their images before paying for them.
I have some stories of past clients who called me, angry that they were having a hard time scanning in their proofs. I sold everything a la carte at that time and their gift certificate had not included any images or files. They did not want to spend a penny. I tried to work with them, but ultimately I gave them a second set of proofs, and I'm 99% sure those were scanned in b/c before that they told me their plans with the pictures and how much they loved them. But they 'un-friended' me, so I'll never know.
Now, I only have packages that include the digital images, so that shouldn't matter, right? Wrong.
5) The logo prevents your face or your children's faces to be used by another "faux-tographer."
Some people use other images before their own portfolio is good enough.
Last week I got a call from an observant photographer with
Blair Photography. (I like his work, he does weddings in Arkansas FYI.)
He asked me to check my email to see if this image was mine.

Yes! I couldn't believe my eyes! My Valentine from a couple of years ago had been pirated, defaced with graffiti, then claimed as another's and used to promote her photography! I consulted lawyers. My husband is a lawyer. We decided that I should ask/demand her to take down the images soon. But do you see the little girl in the tutu? Her daddy is also a lawyer. His wife, the baby girl's mommy, volunteered her husband's services to write a cease and desist letter which he did that night. It included the fines that she should pay by penalty of the federal copyright laws. By late morning, the images were removed. But the damage had already been done. As she asked, the image had been "shared" 5 times to other pages. I messaged each of them letting them know what had happened, knowing they had no clue, but asking them to please remove the picture. The little baby boy's parents were also upset. They could not believe the new emotion they were feeling. The mom did contact this photographer to let her know how upset this made her. Here's another screen shot of another time she posted it to her photography wall. Luckily she didn't have a working website at the time, so it was only on her Facebook page.

The man who notified me told me that this was not her first time. She had done this to other photographers. He said that when he was first notified that his own image had been used as hers, more than half of her images on her site were not her own. She had since taken them down one by one as the true copyright holders contacted her. Most of those were online, but his image was had been used it in a print advertisement in a newspaper. It was one of his wedding images, not even one of his best. I knew what he was saying, this is my work from years ago too, so I have better more recent images. He said that this image did not look like her other pictures so he did a Google Images search and found the original source was from my blog, this picture. (I just now put the watermark on it. It's probably the only picture that didn't have a logo on it b/c that's exactly how I printed their 5x7 Valentines so that one mom could surprise the other mom.)

So now you know, I need to protect both my work and your babies. That's why I watermark my images.